Binance P2P Scam-Related Bank Lien (Layer 2) – Binance CS Asking Me to Refund the Buyer Instead of the Actual Cyber Fraud Victim.

​

I'm dealing with a sophisticated cybercrime-related financial institution lien challenge in India involving a Binance P2P transaction, and I want recommendation from individuals accustomed to the Indian cybercrime investigation course of.

Here's what happened:

I bought USDT by way of Binance P2P to a buyer named Rafikul Islam. He paid me by means of his bank account, and I launched the USDT to him.

Later, I found that Rafikul Islam was concerned in a transaction the place an precise cybercrime victim had transferred cash to him. Rafikul then used these funds to buy USDT from me.

The actual sufferer filed a cybercrime grievance, and the money trail ultimately reached my bank account. My account now has a lien, and I'm presently identified as Layer 2 in the transaction chain.

My fundamental concern:

Binance Buyer Help is asking me to rearrange a refund to Rafikul Islam. Nevertheless, Rafikul is just not the precise sufferer. The precise victim is the one that originally transferred the money to Rafikul.

Initially, I assumed that when Binance returned the USDT to my pockets, I might promote these USDT and use the proceeds to compensate the actual victim. I genuinely believed this is able to help resolve the matter.

Nevertheless, the state of affairs has grow to be difficult because Binance is insisting that I organize a refund to Rafikul as an alternative of helping coordinate a decision involving the actual victim.

Moreover, refunding the precise sufferer shouldn't be an easy course of. Because the funds are related to a cybercrime investigation and my account is already beneath lien, I can't merely switch the cash immediately. I'll need to coordinate with legal professionals, the investigating authorities and probably the courtroom to comply with the right authorized procedure. This makes your complete course of much more difficult and time-consuming.

If I refund Rafikul independently:

- I'll endure a monetary loss as a result of I've already released the USDT.

- The precise sufferer should not receive their disputed cash.

- My present bank lien might stay unresolved.

I want recommendation on the following:

1. Can Binance facilitate the return of the USDT to my wallet so that I can organize compensation for the actual sufferer by way of the right authorized process?

2. Why is Binance insisting on refunding Rafikul as an alternative of addressing the actual victim's claim?

3. Can the investigating officer facilitate the restoration of the disputed quantity on to the precise sufferer?

4. What is the right procedure for a Layer 2 beneficiary in this state of affairs?

5. What can I do if Binance Customer Help refuses to cooperate or present a correct written resolution?

I'm prepared to cooperate absolutely with the investigating authorities. My intention is to ensure that the actual victim gets their a refund whereas avoiding duplicate payments, an incorrect refund or additional monetary loss.

Any genuine recommendation from people who have skilled comparable Binance P2P disputes or Indian cybercrime-related financial institution liens can be significantly appreciated.